|
Memory cards in practice
 Both SanDisk and ATP also sell card readers. SanDisk sell a great CF-only USB or FireWire reader that's perfect for office use, while ATP's reader is tiny and versatile, perfect for field work.
| Canon EOS 40D / RAW + JPEG until buffer full |
|
| Card |
|
Shots |
buffer flush |
| ATP Pro Max II |
14 |
24.5 s |
| SanDisk Extreme IV |
14 |
21.4 s |
| SanDisk Extreme III |
14 |
24.8 s |
| Apacer Photo Steno II pro 100X |
12 |
42.4 s |
| Sony MS PRO Duo |
14 |
68 s |
| Sony MS PRO - HG Duo |
14 |
55 s | For the first part of the test, I used a Canon EOS 40D, set to the highest resolution and RAW + JPEG capture. I kept the shutter button pressed until it slowed down. The internal buffer got full after 12 shots, however, all cards except for the slowest, the Apacer 100x, were quick enough to free up two more shots' worth of buffer before slowing it down. The Sony MemoryStick were used with a MS->CF adapter.
| Nikon D3 - Cl (RAW + JPEG) - 20 seconds of shutter actuation |
|
|
| Card |
|
time to buffer full |
shots |
MB |
buffer flush |
| ATP Pro Max II |
7 s |
76 |
350 |
88.1 s |
| SanDisk Extreme IV |
15 s |
97 |
447 |
100.4 s |
| SanDisk Extreme III |
5 s |
54 |
249 |
69.1 s |
| Apacer Photo Steno III pro 150X |
5 s |
59 |
272 |
73.3 s | Then, the big one. The Nikon D3. I set it to RAW + JPEG mode in full resolution. The shutter was activated for a period of 20 seconds, which really showed off the advantages of the SanDisk Extreme IV. It was fast enough to fill the buffer after 97 shots, compared to the Extreme III, which could only manage 54 shots. Add the buffer into the equation, and the Extreme IV gives you a 15 second burst compared to the Extreme III's 5 second burst. The last column represents the time needed to flush te buffer. Oddly enough, the Extreme III proved to be the slowest. (Remember, you need to take the data recorded into the equation as well.)
| Nikon D3 - Cl RAW+JPEG - recorded images and time to flush the buffer |
| Card |
|
shots |
MB |
buffer flush |
| ATP Pro Max II |
38 |
170 |
39.6 s |
| SanDisk Extreme IV |
80 |
362 |
86.1 s |
| SanDisk Extreme III |
30 |
133 |
32.2 s |
| Apacer Photo Steno III pro |
31 |
138 |
33.3 s | For the next test, I kept on pulling the trigger, so to speak, only until the first slowdown. Again, the Extreme III proved to be the slowest of them all, taking only 30 shots, while the Extreme IV could record 80 shots with ease.
| Nikon D3 - Ch (JPEG only), 11.5 seconds of shutter actuation |
|
| Card |
|
shots |
buffer flush |
buffer |
| ATP Pro Max II |
100 |
98.8 s |
not filled |
| SanDisk Extreme IV |
100 |
98.8 s |
not filled |
| SanDisk Extreme III |
60 |
87.4 s |
filled after 6.6 seconds |
| Apacer Photo Steno III pro 150X |
100 |
98.8 s |
not filled | I set the frame rate to 9 fps, JPEG only, and set the camera to capture 100 shots and then finish. Again, the Extreme III was less than impressive, only capturing 60 shots, while the others could manage 100 shots easily.
| Nikon D3 - Ch (RAW + JPEG) - 10 seconds of shutter actuation, buffer full in 2.8 seconds |
| Card |
|
shots |
MB |
buffer flush |
| ATP Pro Max II |
48 |
221 |
52.8 s |
| SanDisk Extreme IV |
57 |
263 |
60.4 s |
| SanDisk Extreme III |
36 |
166 |
42.5 s |
| Apacer Photo Steno III pro 150X |
38 |
175 |
44.1 s | Next test - 9 fps, 10 second burst. Again, the Extreme IV proved to be the best of the bunch, with 57 recorded shots, with the ATP ProMax card a close second, while the two underdogs performed as expected.
| Transfer of 1.88GB to/from card using the ATP Pro Max USB reader on IBM ThinkPad T43 |
| Card |
|
to card |
from card |
94.8 MB transfer to card |
| ATP Pro Max II |
126.2 s |
127.5 s |
4.9 s |
| SanDisk Extreme IV |
111.9 s |
117.5 s |
4.5 s |
| SanDisk Extreme III |
172.4 s |
134.1 s |
7.1 s |
| Apacer Photo Steno III pro 150X |
249.1 s |
139.2 s |
9.4 s | So, what about transfer to and from the computer? I used the new ATP USB 2.0 reader. Again, the differences are quite apparent, though perhaps less so than in the camera. I also tested the transfer of a small amount of data to the card in the rightmost column.
| Transfer of 1.79GB to/from card using the ATP Pro Max USB reader on iMac 2.8 GHz |
| Card |
|
to card |
from card |
195.7 MB transfer to card |
| ATP Pro Max II |
151.2 s |
92.4 s |
16.2 s |
| SanDisk Extreme IV |
141.5 s |
94.1 s |
15.5 s |
| SanDisk Extreme III |
185.4 s |
125.1 s |
19.9 s |
| Apacer Photo Steno III pro 150X |
258.3 s |
158.2 s |
21.8 s | Oddly enough, the results were very different on the iMac, although most cards fared far better than on the IBM. (Did I mention we love Macs?)
Well, this is it. The SanDisk Extreme IV is still the fastest card on the block - it's THE choice if you absolutely need the utmost in speed, as the tests above clearly show. But remember - these cards are expensive and unless you're a reporter, you probably don't need all that speed. Only buy it if you really need it, otherwise, you're probably better off with a larger, slower card.
ATP again proved that they're capable of producing a very fast card, and although it's not quite as fast as the Extreme IV, it might well prove to be faster using ATP's FireWire reader. Don't worry, we're preparing to test that in the near future, and we'll also test all these cards with the Canon 1Ds Mk III, which needs all the speed it can get due to its ginormous pixel count. Also, we'll be testing them with a direct IDE interface, which should allow for transfers of up to 50 MBps.
And another thing - ATP also produce industrial grade cards, and we're currently performig a long-term test in the Krško nuclear power plant - they'll be subjected to vibration, moisture, temperature changes and radiation. We'll let you know as soon as the test is over, but for now - if you don't need the speed, go for robustness or size or both. Click here for a description of the torture that awaits them.
Other than that, the only real disappointment is the SanDisk Extreme III. While it's a perfectly good card, it's just too expensive for the speed it provides. In other words, buying it wasn't a very wise choice. On the other hand, cards are so cheap nowadays, it's hardly a matter of life and death.
So - buy whatever you need, but if you're buying the Nikon D3 or either one of Canon's Mk IIIs - go for the Extreme IV, it's the only card that's fast enough for these cameras.
Got questions? Ask them in the forum.
« Prev 1 [2]
Author :
By Matjaž Intihar. Translation by Jože Svetičič.
Contact e-Photographia.com

|
- SDHC ATP 4Gb Class 6 memory card review in Nuclear Power Plant Krško labs
We then decided that that wasn’t quite it. We could add another variable – radiation. With all the traveling these days and increased security checks at the airports, X-ray exposure is a fact of life. Film was never entirely safe, especially when passing through multiple airports. So, what would happen with a memory card? Read on and find out.
- Followup - Extreme memory card testing in Nuclear Power Plant Krško labs
After a few shots, though, the camera started shutting down. Press the shutter, watch the camera shut down. Not a very pleasant experience. After a few futile attempts to get things working, a »No memory card« warning showed up. After opening up the memory card door, I immediately noticed a large gap where the two halves of the card were molded together. Obviously, the card couldn't stand the high temperatures we exposed it to, which were well above its specifications. Oddly enough, neither our resident lab tester Željko nor I noticed anything a week after the test was concluded. Obviously, this structural defect must have occured later. Also, above the contacts and at the four points where the both halves are joined, deformations were apparent. The high temperature deformed the non-industrial material. Still, the card retained its data. It's also possible to use it in a camera. However, it tends to lose contact every now and then, making it unsuitable for serious use.
- Testing of CompactFlash cards in industrial conditions
In the previous test in Nuclear Plant Krško labs, I tested the cards at various degrees of temperature changes. It was apparent that there are marked differences between industrial and commercial specifications. Not only that, but after a relatively short period, the commercial spec Kodak card stopped working completely.
- Nikon Sendai plant visit
A tour of the Nikon Sendai plant. The birth of a Nikon D3, in other words.
- Nikon D3 and Nikon D300 first impressions
First impressions review of the Nikon D3 and Nikon D300.
- ATP ProMax USB 2.0 - A Swiss Army knife
ATP sent us a card reader - it's tiny, it's versatile, and it's probably one of the nicest and most inexpensive things you can put in your camera bag. Read on ...
- A few shots with a production Nikon D300
Want to see how a production Nikon D300 works on models? Well, only one way to find out.
(I don't really have to tell you to click the link, do I?)
|